Black-capped Petrel Pterodroma hasitata Scientific name definitions

Yvan Satgé, Adam Brown, Jennifer A. Wheeler, and Kate E. Sutherland
Version: 3.1 — Published February 2, 2024

Systematics

Systematics History

Taxonomy, as well as relationships to other Pterodroma species, is discussed extensively in Simons et al. (5). The taxonomy of Black-capped Petrel is complex, with great variation between types (see Plumages), causing Howell and Zufelt (17) to describe it as “vexed.” Here we provide a summary of Simons et al. (5) and other relevant information. Note that phenotypes in Black-capped Petrel have been referred to as “dark-faced,” “black-faced,” or “dark morph,” and “light-faced,” “white-faced,” or “light morph”. Since there is genetic evidence that these types diverged from a common ancestor (with intermediate types grouped with the light type; 18), we chose to use the term “form” until the taxonomy can be better resolved.

Before the 1800s, Black-capped Petrel was placed in the genus Procellaria with other gadfly petrels. In 1856, Bonaparte proposed the genus Pterodroma for all dark species, and the genus Aestrelata for some of species that had white underparts, including theBlack-capped Petrel; Coues (19) designated hasitata as the type for this genus. Black-capped Petrel has been placed in the genus Pterodroma since Loomis (20).

In addition to confusion over the status of dark and light-form birds, there is also disagreement on the status of the all-dark taxon caribbaea; it has variably been treated as a subspecies of Black-capped Petrel or treated as a distinct species, Jamaican Petrel (Pterodroma caribbaea), as we do here (see also Subspecies).

Geographic Variation

No clear geographic variation has been described in breeding Black-capped Petrels. At known nesting sites on Hispaniola, most petrels captured or photographed by camera traps have been of the dark form (International Black-capped Petrel Conservation Group, unpublished data). In Haiti and the southern Dominican Republic, most individuals are of the dark form and only a few individuals (notably one petrel opportunistically captured by Wingate upon his rediscovery of breeding activity in Haiti; 21) have been of the light and intermediate forms. In the central Dominican Republic, only a small number of nests has been located but most of them are those of light form individuals (E. Rupp, unpublished data). Stranded petrels recovered in Dominica in 2007 and 2010 were of the light form (International Black-capped Petrel Conservation Group, unpublished data).

At sea, based on the limited data available, ranges for both forms appear to overlap spatially (but not temporally) in Gulf Stream waters off the eastern coast of the US (7, 5), though opportunistic observations (22) and satellite tracking (12) suggest that light forms may commonly use more northerly areas. Both forms have been recorded in the northern Gulf of Mexico (23). Dark forms tracked by satellite from breeding grounds on Hispaniola used the central Caribbean Sea intensively (24), and there is no reason to think that light forms would not also use these productive waters as well. Both forms have been recorded as vagrants in the Western Palearctic, but light and intermediate forms seem to be more commonly seen (see Table 1).

Subspecies

Two subspecies have historically been recognized: nominate Pterodroma hasitata hasitata and Pterodroma hasitata caribbaea (for the all-dark form that is now probably extinct; 5, 25, 26). Some authors, however, consider caribbaea to be a separate species, the Jamaican Petrel (Pterodroma caribbaea) (e.g., 27, 28, 29, 30).

Within hasitata, two color forms have been described (dark and light, with intermediate forms; see Plumages), with strong variations in plumage and measurements (light-form petrels are generally heavier and bulkier). To elucidate any genetic differences among these different phenotypes, Manly et al. (18) amplified mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase 1 (CO1) and found a fixed genetic difference between the dark and light forms; individuals classified as intermediate all grouped phylogenetically with the light form. Manly et al. (18) therefore suggested that some temporal or spatial breeding isolation led to the differentiation of the two color forms. In addition to phylogenetics, the notable differences in the timing of molt (light forms molt earlier; 7), breeding (tracking data suggests that light forms breed earlier; 12), and of the use of Gulf Stream foraging areas (dark forms are more common in the late summer and early fall, and light forms in April–June; 7), suggest that subspecies status may have some relevance. Dark and light forms also appear to use different non-breeding areas in the western North Atlantic (12). However, Manly et al. (18) cautioned that “whether these populations should be considered distinct subspecies or distinct species remains unclear at this time and cannot be resolved in the absence of population and behavioral data from breeding sites and analysis of nuclear DNA (microsatellites).” Better information on the genetic diversity of Black-capped Petrels from known nesting colonies is therefore necessary to draw further conclusions.

Related Species

Within the genus Pterodroma, Black-capped Petrel appears to be sister to a clade of other Atlantic gadfly petrels, including Bermuda Petrel (Pterodroma cahow), Fea's Petrel (Pterodroma feae), Zino's Petrel (Pterodroma madeira), and the extinct Large St. Helena Petrel (Pterodroma rupinarum) based on mitochondrial DNA sequence data (31, 32, 33, 34). These results largely agree with those of Imber (35), who placed Black-capped Petrel in a large group with Bermuda Petrel, Fea's Petrel, and Zino's Petrel, as well as other gadfly petrels from the South Atlantic, South Pacific, and southern Indian Ocean, based on morphological characters. Jamaican Petrel has not been included in phylogenetic studies, but it is assumed to be closely related to Black-capped Petrel and part of the same clade with Bermuda Petrel, Fea's Petrel, and Zino's Petrel (33).

Together with the other members of this strongly supported clade of Atlantic gadlfy petrels, Black-capped Petrel appears to be closely related to another clade that includes Atlantic Petrel (Pterodroma incerta), White-headed Petrel (Pterodroma lessonii), Great-winged Petrel (Pterodroma macroptera), and Magenta Petrel (Pterodroma magentae) (33).

Hybridization

Not known (36).

Nomenclature

The origin of hasitata comes from the Latin “haesito,” root to the English word "hesitate," indicating the uncertainty Kuhl (37) had concerning the recognition of this species (5).

Black-capped Petrel is known by several names throughout the Caribbean. In North America and in the English language it is also known as “Capped Petrel” and “West Indian Petrel.” In the Spanish- and French-speaking islands, the petrel is usually referred to as “Diablotin” or “Petrel Diablotin.” Diablotin means "little devil," descriptive of the species’ nocturnal habits and the odd-sounding vocalizations, which likely suggested to locals the presence of evil spirits. A mountain peak where it formerly bred in Haiti is named Morne Diablotin; in Dominica, Morne Diablotins is the highest peak on the island. Other names include “Pájaro de la Bruja” in Cuba (“bruja” is Spanish for “witch”), and “chat-huant/chawan” in Haiti and possibly other French-speaking islands (a generic term for nocturnal calling birds).

As noted by Simons et al. (5), Zonfrillo (38) clearly explains why we should seek to call Pterodroma hasitata by its local name, Diablotin: “[T]he local name of the bird, Diablotin, appears to be as much in danger of dying out as the species itself. Where birds such as petrels feature in the economic or historical context of islands, or human populations on islands, it is surely not asking a lot to preserve the local name and incorporate it into modern usage? ‘Capped Petrel’, or ‘Black-capped Petrel’ as the bird is now referred to in the USA, are names which tell little about the bird or its history. There are several species of Pterodroma and shearwaters that have caps or a capped appearance. Along with the endangered Cahow Pterodroma cahow of Bermuda, the Gon-Gon Pterodroma feae of the Deserta & Cape Verde Islands, and the virtually extinct Friera Pterodroma madeira of Madeira, the local names are more quaint and evocative than their rather bland English equivalents. The Diablotin, the ‘devil-bird’, should not be allowed to fade away.”

Fossil History

Sub-fossil remains of Pterodroma, confirmed or suspected to represent hasitata, are known from several sites in Haiti (5, 39). Remains found in middens in Martinique (40), St. Croix (US Virgin Islands; 41), and Crooked Island (The Bahamas; 42) are considered to be from harvested specimens and, in the case of The Bahamas, outside the accepted prehistorical breeding range for the species (42). None of this material has been dated, although samples from Haiti are believed to be from the late Pleistocene to Holocene (5, 39).

Recommended Citation

Satgé, Y., A. Brown, J. A. Wheeler, and K. E. Sutherland (2024). Black-capped Petrel (Pterodroma hasitata), version 3.1. In Birds of the World (S. M. Billerman, Editor). Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Ithaca, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.2173/bow.bkcpet.03.1
Birds of the World

Partnerships

A global alliance of nature organizations working to document the natural history of all bird species at an unprecedented scale.